@LOLD FRIENDS GATHER FOR A NOSTALGIC BUT BUMPY RIDE INTO AUTO
HISTORY[F/L] (For use by NYTimes News Service clients)[F/L]
[E/P]
July 17   [E/P]
     @BBy LINDA SEEBACH[F/C]
@Lc.1994 Los Angeles Daily News [F/C]
[E/P]
     LOS ANGELES [-]@B @LLast week, I went to Reno to visit the
past. One whole  section of the parking lot at the Reno Hilton was
roped off just for  Packards, a feast for anyone's eyes and a
living tribute to an important part  of American automotive
history.[E/P]
     The occasion was the 29th Annual Meeting of the ``Packard
Club,'' and  several hundred people who own Packards, or who, like
me, just admire them,  came to Reno to see the sights, swap
stories, take pictures and enjoy a  reunion with friends. For many
people whose cherished old car is practically  part of the family,
no vacation trip would be complete without a national  meet. And
when you've seen children grow up from a baby stroller to a Packard 
of their own, sometimes it seems as if gas and oil make ties as
strong as  blood.[E/P]
     My friends Stella Pyrtek and Stuart Blond were married at the
Packard  national in Pittsburgh in 1986 and what could be more
natural? They met at  the 1985 national in Providence, R.I., so
when they decided to merge their  Packard collections, of course
they let the Packard Club set the date. Stella  lived in New
Jersey, and Stuart was from Los Angeles, and so everyone they  both
knew would be in Pennsylvania.[E/P]
     Their wedding plans presented a small problem, though because
no one would  believe they intended to be married in a Parking lot.
So many clergymen hung  up on them, apparently thinking someone was
playing a practical joke, that  for a while Stella thought they
would have to stage a fake wedding.[E/P]     It was part of the
official program, after all and they didn't want to  disappoint
anyone. The wedding was beautiful. The bride rode down the aisle 
in a 1929 Packard Twelve Cabriolet with a custom body by
Brunn.[E/P]    ``I thought only a few close friends would come, she
said, and when I got  out of the car and everyone a the meet was
there, I almost cried.[E/P]   For their wedding pictures, the
couple posed in ``Old Pacific, a 1903  Packard that had recently
been driven coast-to-coast to commemorate the first  such trip
ever, made by a 1903 Packard. I took pictures of the wedding with 
Stuart's camera.[E/P]
     This year in Reno, we had another wedding to celebrate, with
a reception in  the club' hospitality suite for Jeff and Joan Price
of Dayton, Ohio.[E/P]    From 1973 to 1986, I went to Packard
nationals every year. For nine years, I  was editor of the club
newsletter and I spent the week frantically trying to  make certain
I had an identified picture of every car that showed up.[E/P]    It
seemed to me that if someone cared enough to drive a Packard
hundreds or  even thousands of miles to the meet, the least I could
do was put its picture  in the newsletter. Now Stuart is the
newsletter editor, and he's the one out  in the hot desert sun
walking up and down the rows of cars with a ton of  cameras.[E/P]
     ``Do you miss it, Linda?'' he asked. And I do.[E/P]
     Not everyone brings a Packard to the meet, but everyone gets
to ride in one.  Or in several, which is even better. Just stand
out in the parking lot and  someone will ask you to hop in. On one
tour, I rode in a 1938 Super 8, a  seven-passenger touring
limousine owned by Wayne Parsons of Santa Rosa,  Calif. Wayne, who
has had the car since 1951, was among the founders of the  Packard
Club in 1953. Now it has about 4,000 members.[E/P]
     That's actually rather small, as car clubs go, because Packard
was not a  large manufacturer. There are car clubs for every make,
for every era and for  every imaginable specialty. The fact is,
antique and collector cars are not  only a family hobby, they're
big business. And for all our happy nostalgia  trip last week, the
business and the hobby both are gravely threatened by  federal
regulation.[E/P]
     Supposedly pursuing the goal of cleaner air, the Environmental
Protection  Agency is pressuring the states to get older cars off
the road, regardless of  the fact that they contribute only a small
part of the problem of pollution.  Nasty little nuisances like leaf
blowers and wood whackers probably do more  damage to the
environment than the antique car hobby does, and there's  nothing
historically valuable about them.[E/P]
     A small fraction of cars, typically those that are badly
maintained or have  been deliberately tampered with, emit most of
the pollutants. They can be  identified by with on-road testing.
But bureaucrats at the EPA, like  bureaucrats everywhere, love to
make up rules that other people have to  follow and they don't care
if it ruins your harmless hobby or reduces the  value of your
property.[E/P]
     Stella Pyrtek-Blond is the Packard Club's vice president for
public  relations, and part of her job is to monitor legislation
that might affect  old cars. New Jersey, she says, is testing the
sort of centralized  emission-testing equipment that the EPA tried
to force on California. It's  been inoperative a large part of the
time, and when it is running it doesn't  give consistent results.
But if fully installed, it would cost New Jersey  drivers and
taxpayers an estimated $222 million. Lobbying pressure to adopt 
big, expensive solutions is intense.[E/P]
     The greatest threat to the hobby is the so-called ``clunker''
bills.  Typically, they provide that old cars can be scrapped [-]
just because  they're old, not necessarily because they are in poor
shape [-] in return for  pollution control credits. These bills
don't usually target antique or  collector cars directly, because
legislators can read their mail. But, they  often do require that
the major systems of the cars be destroyed rather than  recycled,
and that can make it impossible to find the parts needed to keep 
collector cars in good repair. Which is, no doubt, the
intention.[E/P]     The effect on air quality is not easy to
determine. If someone scraps an old  car that was in regular use,
it will eventually create a demand for another  new car, and
automobile manufacture is a resource and energy intensive  process.
Even if the new car operates more cleanly, the difference may not
be  great enough to make up for the pollution created by
manufacturer of the new  vehicle. If an old car that was scarcely
driven at all is scrapped, that  doesn't help the air, but the
emission credits gained may allow pollution to  continue
elsewhere.[E/P]
     Car owners are beginning to do their own lobbying to
counteract the  advocates of scrapping programs a lot of history
will be unnecessarily  scrapped if they fail.[E/P]
